{"id":"W1982022197","doi":"10.1080/00949650903449268","title":"Likelihood ratio tests for testing for multiple contaminants in the shocks and labelled slippage models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Nanyang Technological University","keywords":"Outlier; Slippage; Statistics; Mathematics; Likelihood-ratio test; Monte Carlo method; Econometrics; Statistic; Statistical hypothesis testing; Score test; Test statistic; Shock (circulatory); Maximum likelihood; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08429579,0.001617899,0.003689337,0.0046814,0.001203588,0.003062437,0.006436065,0.004631465,0.003735557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3598639,0.0009549296,0.002841023,0.004510236,0.006789967,0.006259438,0.003231584,0.003563929,0.0006994695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001645573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002090521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001255938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006403027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8979298,0.07831815,0.003641184,0.008878792,0.009355683,0.001876311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4272215,0.5275334,0.0230882,0.01545258,0.004696878,0.002007545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005610089,0.0009250611,0.1644128,0.001316758,0.004639424,0.004447843,0.001992931,0.4022774,0.005143992,0.2240041,0.003834416,0.1813952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000332777,0.001737119,0.01855836,0.0001240242,0.000259853,0.0007301588,0.0003974638,0.8525192,0.003013633,0.1205058,0.001611915,0.0002097226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1360544,0.0005220129,0.8602819,0.0004272645,0.00009129111,0.0003467546,0.0006169506,0.0005519895,0.001107361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8028037,0.0002540296,0.1930486,0.0002134563,0.0001864226,0.00100977,0.001456612,0.0001232444,0.0009041723],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08429579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4458041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.157091153234363,"score_gpt":0.4467549268590428,"score_spread":0.2896637736246798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}