{"id":"W1982052166","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.012","title":"Ten-year regeneration responses to varying levels of overstory retention in two productive southern British Columbia ecosystems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Larch; Basal area; Shade tolerance; Stocking; Sowing; Biology; Natural regeneration; Ecosystem; Silviculture; Regeneration (biology); Thinning; Environmental science; Ecology; Agronomy; Forestry; Animal science; Geography; Canopy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007612905,0.00008978006,0.0001633417,0.0000830997,0.0001606274,0.00003299984,0.0001402549,0.00007406789,0.0009435824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005414159,0.0001269391,0.00002770581,0.0001572198,0.0001634281,0.000146726,0.0003005161,0.0001238813,0.0001178022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000888339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006870097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004835803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6984519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988509,0.0001008034,0.000259442,0.0004210179,0.0001160982,0.0002516687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995753,0.00002972427,0.0001061632,0.000223624,0.00001114782,0.00005409618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001049772,0.0001712923,0.9819939,0.00006942701,0.00004564846,0.00005192088,0.0004460127,0.001429872,0.001018592,0.005946264,0.006946385,0.001775776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007319169,0.0001557264,0.9896284,0.00001940655,0.00002638213,0.000007434639,0.0002488606,0.0002209397,0.00004448025,0.005418158,0.003361328,0.0001369648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993183,0.000006719615,0.0002433937,0.0002031018,0.0005282272,0.001055329,0.00001939882,0.0000237387,0.004737136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882323,0.00001416992,0.001365843,0.0001478663,0.00003313835,0.0001831729,0.00001072367,0.00001081061,0.01000197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6936161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999697,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008754742851735884,"score_gpt":0.2136197650143845,"score_spread":0.2048650221626487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}