{"id":"W1982056669","doi":"10.1037/a0023427","title":"On the ambiguity of concept use in commentaries.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0359867,0.0005714439,0.0004554706,0.003897902,0.01004423,0.006922783,0.002829205,0.01016697,0.009972425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2919513,0.0006261655,0.0004194094,0.002973925,0.01169251,0.01439135,0.00625049,0.01202749,0.001705821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00489396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002905458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005836966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00619658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.959349,0.02731277,0.002718632,0.002461065,0.006493415,0.00166505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4395129,0.5080297,0.01128673,0.008260711,0.03119388,0.001716103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002414246,0.00002838707,0.002968824,0.0007303493,0.00003909306,0.001821342,0.3180191,0.0001679084,0.001939713,0.3756193,0.2830717,0.01535278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004127272,0.00003967906,0.007157368,0.003020525,0.00004069749,0.001103211,0.1557728,0.00117324,0.004163039,0.08842444,0.7388563,0.0002074111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08309603,0.008332528,0.0193429,0.643241,0.01540344,0.0002114919,0.001456529,0.0003247364,0.2285914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8697114,0.002311009,0.003722759,0.08918332,0.006818585,0.0002744395,0.0003922618,0.0005217121,0.02706454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0359867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1903182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07385694327672293,"score_gpt":0.334029037045265,"score_spread":0.2601720937685421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}