{"id":"W1982144177","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.040","title":"Hydraulic conductivity heterogeneity of a local deltaic aquifer system from the kriged 3D distribution of hydrofacies from borehole logs, Valcartier, Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Geological Survey of Canada; Natural Resources Canada; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hydraulic conductivity; Borehole; Geology; Aquifer; Lithology; Kriging; Facies; Slug test; Geostatistics; Soil science; Petrophysics; Variogram; Spatial variability; Hydrology (agriculture); Groundwater; Geotechnical engineering; Geomorphology; Petrology; Soil water; Porosity; Structural basin","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002804963,0.0001352417,0.0004492709,0.00001782181,0.0001509099,0.000004003363,0.0002813349,0.00007414983,0.00005798376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003587345,0.00009055912,0.0001137727,0.0001107291,0.0006052573,0.0001425404,0.0001292482,0.0001779081,0.000004883183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002827278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008704808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3122883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1437391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983459,0.0002874472,0.0005787162,0.0001568333,0.0004331789,0.0001979158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989297,0.0001936776,0.0005465903,0.0002087549,0.0000569662,0.00006434991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000349229,0.000266061,0.9314795,0.00001671764,0.0005623983,0.0001669108,0.001516084,0.009791637,0.04583704,0.00002874633,0.005517644,0.004468041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001149952,0.000327788,0.9235442,0.0000239791,0.0001637027,0.0001906883,0.0007967342,0.002796334,0.06094452,0.00009245723,0.009801788,0.0001678804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838392,0.0005232478,0.01469899,0.0003907883,0.0002995889,0.00007378572,0.0001341809,0.000004411515,0.00003586473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997034,0.00002518456,0.00004319287,0.0001276701,0.00005258017,0.00000284981,0.0000187069,0.000005597708,0.00002083532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1685492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8718854,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01321993542733355,"score_gpt":0.1998153854697873,"score_spread":0.1865954500424538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}