{"id":"W1982174961","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.027","title":"Resource compensation and negotiation support in an aboriginal context: Using community-based multi-attribute analysis to evaluate non-market losses","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry","keywords":"Negotiation; Valuation (finance); Damages; Metis; Resource (disambiguation); Human settlement; Context (archaeology); Market value; Compensation (psychology); Economics; Environmental economics; Actuarial science; Public economics; Environmental resource management; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Geography; Political science; Social science; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006103295,0.0005030193,0.0005528511,0.002022711,0.001513755,0.002663102,0.001085142,0.001051909,0.0013765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02426302,0.0002052318,0.0005813844,0.001501277,0.001031092,0.002221625,0.001376109,0.001070812,0.0001032771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002703182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001388016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05123533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981591,0.001224551,0.00007249202,0.0001270819,0.0002548713,0.0001618891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870815,0.008706701,0.001677963,0.0004540076,0.001150688,0.0009292007],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004099618,0.002238369,0.9065594,0.0001170468,0.0007097878,0.0007109648,0.01028332,0.02772695,0.002524036,0.004785143,0.0003581403,0.03988726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001079975,0.001228467,0.6391459,0.00005320925,0.0004328116,0.000254525,0.02248566,0.3274736,0.001651874,0.006402711,0.0006716059,0.00009165108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989247,0.00002294476,0.0005171729,0.00002625352,0.000001782403,0.00001331624,0.00001407315,0.000002312279,0.000477478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994022,0.000008704274,0.0004789489,0.000002975204,0.000001188059,0.000008155313,0.00001808842,0.000001332356,0.00007839355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.046879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09321225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1322403698824335,"score_gpt":0.2992038360594818,"score_spread":0.1669634661770482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}