{"id":"W1982178888","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.075","title":"Competitive facility location model with concave demand","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Facility Location and Emergency Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knapsack problem; Mathematical optimization; Cannibalization; Computer science; Heuristic; Facility location problem; Piecewise linear function; Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Linear programming; Scheme (mathematics); Location model; Concave function; Operations research; Mathematics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002549652,0.002717866,0.005270593,0.002214293,0.002424206,0.007068502,0.009405096,0.0111822,0.03411129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008149023,0.002602746,0.002122909,0.005146489,0.004846638,0.006944075,0.003000171,0.005151328,0.004266123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006398438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00291352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03265919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01950362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974235,0.0008894161,0.00007156898,0.000466869,0.0002930237,0.0008556751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915222,0.004745389,0.0009903138,0.0003664439,0.001074547,0.001301119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005512959,0.0003258951,0.000884346,0.000300741,0.00008927834,0.0009931492,0.0001793346,0.6175721,0.000663343,0.3579559,0.01396857,0.00651604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003050618,0.0001798758,0.0003688208,0.00003739861,0.00006584168,0.0002686121,0.00018517,0.9146847,0.0001341619,0.08066992,0.003001188,0.00009918501],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2904353,0.004240301,0.491672,0.02063292,0.0009127044,0.000562919,0.007940032,0.001324332,0.1822795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9082732,0.001470596,0.01166956,0.0007316155,0.0003479259,0.0002463128,0.001117107,0.0001549841,0.07598876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03411129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1141136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07573026627728462,"score_gpt":0.3009627957577998,"score_spread":0.2252325294805151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}