{"id":"W1982275575","doi":"10.1139/f05-105","title":"Exploratory assessment of historical recruitment patterns using relative abundance and catch data","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Relative species abundance; Stock assessment; Abundance (ecology); Statistics; Smoothing; Econometrics; Variance (accounting); Environmental science; Stock (firearms); Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Geography; Economics; Fishing; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002786939,0.0003920545,0.0003936332,0.002847855,0.0004521628,0.00044502,0.0005473642,0.0002950103,0.002724176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007366948,0.0001807533,0.0002726642,0.001944109,0.00021712,0.0008088718,0.0004483633,0.0002742415,0.0008532034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002357545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000236408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003275798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0129112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994795,0.000169756,0.00006813647,0.0001195486,0.0001231058,0.00004002848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961441,0.001910407,0.0006063289,0.0004116886,0.0006871901,0.0002402898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004312205,0.0002603779,0.8675023,0.0002328445,0.0001521563,0.0003714707,0.001394937,0.005469029,0.02076416,0.001265756,0.001468644,0.1006871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002067954,0.0004985209,0.9585688,0.00003831761,0.00004405454,0.0004200754,0.000771251,0.03169943,0.003433527,0.001700214,0.002756783,0.00004845528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9579464,0.0001494785,0.03436043,0.00006246191,0.000007620784,0.0002363744,0.002276922,0.0003302545,0.00463005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633127,0.0001296825,0.03251886,0.00002000256,0.000008869725,0.0001987617,0.002364557,0.00005260426,0.001394002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01473892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1209033356402443,"score_gpt":0.2984904600982977,"score_spread":0.1775871244580535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}