{"id":"W1982307869","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.05.031","title":"Executive stock options and incentive effects due to systematic risk","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Banking & Finance","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Hong Kong University of Science and Technology; University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Incentive; Systematic risk; Executive compensation; Stock options; Non-qualified stock option; Business; Stock (firearms); Actuarial science; Restricted stock; Systematic review; Economics; Finance; Microeconomics; Stock market","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003514946,0.0005545632,0.0008943378,0.0006955946,0.0003591416,0.001718965,0.0005946848,0.002246635,0.01068765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02895771,0.0005689873,0.0005830415,0.0005027245,0.001142601,0.003133056,0.001086382,0.002208937,0.0003581325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004566836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000441867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007402861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008928376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995838,0.0001325457,0.00003269923,0.00005091822,0.00007340962,0.0001267108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676116,0.02361289,0.004588182,0.001470545,0.0009219063,0.001794908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007858535,0.004332555,0.2889056,0.000537289,0.0006503063,0.006644179,0.00185019,0.1016617,0.01797376,0.4727876,0.006715415,0.09008282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00148762,0.001802346,0.338794,0.0001296937,0.0007128443,0.001723217,0.0007747322,0.1601029,0.002959668,0.489188,0.002155643,0.00016936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880559,0.0005206522,0.003066708,0.001240561,0.00005009721,0.00002052639,0.00009352725,0.0000400689,0.006912018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977767,0.0001819603,0.0002322375,0.00007110157,0.00006623212,0.000005757011,0.00003006243,0.000004942628,0.001630939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01068765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03575373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01338048093518484,"score_gpt":0.2123042371556075,"score_spread":0.1989237562204226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}