{"id":"W1982307869","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.05.031","title":"Executive stock options and incentive effects due to systematic risk","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Banking & Finance","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Hong Kong University of Science and Technology; University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Incentive; Systematic risk; Executive compensation; Stock options; Non-qualified stock option; Business; Stock (firearms); Actuarial science; Restricted stock; Systematic review; Economics; Finance; Microeconomics; Stock market","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006685376,0.0001628208,0.0006761538,0.0002604307,0.0001827566,0.0001025714,0.0001872553,0.00006878614,0.000008247839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004042628,0.0001563983,0.0001214616,0.0002804156,0.00006109805,0.0004387803,0.00005004754,0.0002363499,0.00003647036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001825227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004728475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007552405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001019075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986789,0.00003387409,0.0007721437,0.0002118113,0.00006636339,0.0002368932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998434,0.0001181746,0.001133516,0.0001653091,0.0000835906,0.0000654009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007424453,0.0001722485,0.007130541,0.00160008,0.0001336368,0.0001272664,0.002798056,0.001480302,0.0000475202,0.9854616,0.0004395796,0.0005349372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002280104,0.001535519,0.4569562,0.009438279,0.00009121659,0.0001579579,0.0002335489,0.0002054146,0.0003987527,0.525076,0.002998027,0.0006290426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687154,0.01025128,0.01502653,0.0003744921,0.000755675,0.0004770904,0.0000318148,0.00001182076,0.004355884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934978,0.001206754,0.004840467,0.0001931685,0.0001089928,0.00001878119,4.290051e-7,0.00001559581,0.000118028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4603856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6377738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01338048093518484,"score_gpt":0.2123042371556075,"score_spread":0.1989237562204226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}