{"id":"W1982329760","doi":"10.1023/b:arti.0000046007.11806.9a","title":"Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Underpinning; Epistemology; Probabilistic argumentation; Computer science; Empirical evidence; Deductive reasoning; Model-based reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering; Knowledge representation and reasoning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004652344,0.00008098004,0.0001057915,0.00004972174,0.0001927247,0.0001455894,0.0001031539,0.00004164474,0.00001953474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000786195,0.00007310703,0.00002449206,0.0001534523,0.00007060725,0.00116317,0.00003825733,0.00004524573,0.000005601882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001389291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003221407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005258329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001622167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991362,0.00005521409,0.0002943372,0.0002027484,0.0001650569,0.0001464476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995431,0.00005558687,0.0001140656,0.000149379,0.00008857319,0.0000493204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003042268,0.00001782264,0.0007515706,0.00001920376,0.000006569777,4.935931e-7,0.002013969,0.0001126191,0.004290808,0.960088,0.000009403808,0.03268649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001290397,0.0002843799,0.005964165,0.0004368433,0.00004189112,0.00003457463,0.00211474,0.2301173,0.6862845,0.06984866,0.004201346,0.0005425281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3415566,0.0006743489,0.6566121,0.0001926835,0.0001743774,0.0001565303,0.000001335514,0.00002329526,0.0006087364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852991,0.0002018933,0.01429901,0.0001272131,0.00003354331,0.00001253019,0.00000136876,0.00000319379,0.00002216369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8902394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2981218,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09223170808788776,"score_gpt":0.3304854798686168,"score_spread":0.238253771780729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}