{"id":"W1982329760","doi":"10.1023/b:arti.0000046007.11806.9a","title":"Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Underpinning; Epistemology; Probabilistic argumentation; Computer science; Empirical evidence; Deductive reasoning; Model-based reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering; Knowledge representation and reasoning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0180226,0.00173882,0.002017637,0.006147632,0.002874177,0.01451511,0.005599544,0.008527925,0.006233196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03152883,0.002250122,0.00418888,0.006632063,0.0207565,0.03781152,0.007339352,0.01041991,0.001085674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003950841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002633546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002460787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00198137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.986127,0.008327654,0.001460415,0.001348446,0.002172173,0.0005642303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776992,0.01483459,0.001572777,0.003416986,0.001879329,0.0005971731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005180043,0.000004895627,0.00003992436,0.00005002963,0.00001171075,0.00002641954,0.0002906301,0.001396059,0.00005130532,0.9955259,0.0003564204,0.002241528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052365,0.000001862866,0.00001285042,0.00002273367,0.00000701282,0.00002098089,0.00003223416,0.003219468,0.00003779575,0.9946145,0.002020755,0.000004510948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005290969,0.003072923,0.9645952,0.009281181,0.0001828515,0.00009669925,0.0001842192,0.0001908456,0.01710512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3438911,0.00432197,0.6417254,0.001677492,0.0010006,0.0005161465,0.0006764058,0.0002130924,0.005977737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0180226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09531373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09223170808788776,"score_gpt":0.3304854798686168,"score_spread":0.238253771780729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}