{"id":"W1982335236","doi":"10.1145/2594458","title":"Peer Review on Open-Source Software Projects","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Software technical review; Technical peer review; Peer review; Quality assurance; Software peer review; Quality (philosophy); Empirical research; Software; Software quality assurance; Data science; Knowledge management; Software development; Software quality; Operations management; Engineering; Software construction; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08174722,0.0004608826,0.001310423,0.01210265,0.003775605,0.005078059,0.002462025,0.001409639,0.004320083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5293169,0.00068688,0.0005704486,0.008061309,0.003814652,0.00592144,0.005668247,0.001468297,0.001568034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002856785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007491152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002736775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003457765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8205637,0.07552339,0.01482091,0.01032169,0.07567772,0.003092597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2009789,0.5094696,0.1203555,0.04598414,0.1146586,0.008553343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008520453,0.0003926612,0.3696089,0.00319606,0.0003690273,0.001479779,0.04108339,0.004671469,0.005527455,0.01791166,0.0185597,0.5363479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001857839,0.001818132,0.7859403,0.002718218,0.0002697374,0.001904609,0.02614939,0.01949151,0.009230405,0.02434751,0.1274951,0.0004493617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9018621,0.004572528,0.04440666,0.003036129,0.0004224127,0.002826826,0.001474434,0.0008778266,0.04052103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762781,0.001479656,0.01474091,0.0002307521,0.000311242,0.0009435561,0.0007412886,0.0001447214,0.005129713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.997538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4323258,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1125589028151714,"score_gpt":0.3427943887818269,"score_spread":0.2302354859666556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}