{"id":"W1982348662","doi":"10.1007/s002670010181","title":"Print Media Framing of the Environmental Movement in a Canadian Forestry Debate","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Newspaper; Framing (construction); Print media; Environmental movement; Alliance; Government (linguistics); Environmentalism; Media coverage; Political science; Forest management; Sociology; Geography; Media studies; Forestry; Politics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003350005,0.0000870267,0.00007653837,0.00008124108,0.0002379665,0.00001610107,0.0003625783,0.00004726105,0.002139925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005426909,0.00007984148,0.00004930018,0.00009684207,0.0002093401,0.0000754225,0.0002220217,0.00009337239,0.00006518287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009968347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001202935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06532152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3754873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989333,0.0001095284,0.0001927295,0.0001498773,0.0003165787,0.0002979483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999486,0.00002038603,0.0000644372,0.0003164602,6.159862e-7,0.0001120956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001067721,0.0002717728,0.9131663,0.00001153618,0.00002059428,0.00001381388,0.0239524,0.0001316317,0.0008200174,0.003623686,0.0001143931,0.05786311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002261284,0.000007105992,0.8950207,0.00002416513,0.000008033933,3.281279e-7,0.0182537,0.00008402823,0.00006007367,0.000396904,0.08582387,0.00009494775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697605,0.0001025191,0.000008130856,0.001257772,0.0001289796,0.000453184,0.00001570053,0.000008167684,0.02826501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936439,0.004820236,0.00008965709,0.0004705627,0.00002679618,0.00004333126,0.00002543145,0.000008498231,0.0008715341],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3101658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0929953361712684,"score_gpt":0.3076594801443066,"score_spread":0.2146641439730382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}