{"id":"W1982420064","doi":"10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.09.014","title":"On logarithmic solutions to the conformal Ward identities","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nuclear Physics B","topic":"Algebraic structures and combinatorial models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ansatz; Primary field; Conformal map; Logarithm; Operator product expansion; Mathematics; Context (archaeology); Conformal field theory; Rank (graph theory); Operator (biology); Field (mathematics); Point (geometry); Pure mathematics; Algebra over a field; Mathematical physics; Mathematical analysis; Combinatorics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009898301,0.001256444,0.001252893,0.001960519,0.00238708,0.003766104,0.001850707,0.002519852,0.01372272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004866927,0.0005338157,0.0008544181,0.001563107,0.004126615,0.00623728,0.002834188,0.003183278,0.001979208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002036393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001410267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001996334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002152408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995669,0.0001348997,0.00002205172,0.00004175382,0.0001364783,0.00009805399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988995,0.0003604771,0.0001727033,0.0001368224,0.0001818438,0.0002486902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000126002,0.00002024723,0.00005637505,0.00001207481,0.000001910063,0.00004390304,0.00007575377,0.0005853723,0.0001766014,0.9970714,0.0007910982,0.001152754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001429587,0.000004249431,0.00005722596,0.000006066189,0.000001072311,0.00003338951,0.00004162753,0.004082363,0.00003989297,0.995248,0.0004671809,0.000004672293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5268354,0.001803219,0.09778236,0.0108613,0.001050448,0.0001307666,0.0003920957,0.0003932943,0.3607511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8966482,0.00129926,0.01328599,0.001254298,0.001125186,0.000166972,0.0004507093,0.0001829975,0.08558634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01372272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04590708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03791543398558098,"score_gpt":0.2753478511750991,"score_spread":0.2374324171895181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}