{"id":"W1982483775","doi":"10.3828/tpr.79.2-3.7","title":"Planning a mega-city's future: <i>An evaluation of Shanghai's municipal land-use plan</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Town Planning Review","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"National Development and Reform Commission; Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Strengths and weaknesses; Restructuring; Environmental planning; Context (archaeology); Land use; China; Urban planning; Land-use planning; Regional planning; Business; Regional science; Political science; Geography; Civil engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007487048,0.0003459797,0.0003840194,0.002174424,0.0008122257,0.002328364,0.0006012184,0.0002963821,0.001811423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004392236,0.000152227,0.0002361667,0.003993748,0.0006814493,0.0008906094,0.0008860324,0.0003122929,0.000122521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01285046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01705014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1467935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2981408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958442,0.002402825,0.0001636117,0.00007929602,0.001213316,0.0002966776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969354,0.0005479662,0.0003210103,0.0000804074,0.001910563,0.000204685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006616538,0.0003010486,0.124299,0.0099254,0.0005567238,0.001753042,0.02933534,0.02493416,0.002205611,0.1159019,0.08029786,0.6098282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000251178,0.002708276,0.438276,0.003091341,0.0006469174,0.0004427414,0.09707881,0.007560545,0.004575991,0.004631329,0.4405717,0.0001651513],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8267893,0.05370922,0.001713776,0.01055906,0.0004169256,0.0005702389,0.0009739528,0.00006718019,0.1052004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760849,0.01676882,0.001536864,0.0002992193,0.00003728619,0.00009173351,0.0004108075,0.000007244571,0.004763154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1467935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2918782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1397307852071031,"score_gpt":0.3755765575713488,"score_spread":0.2358457723642457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}