{"id":"W1982612574","doi":"10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930112.x","title":"Environmentally constrained null models: site suitability as occupancy criterion","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Null model; Occupancy; Null (SQL); Null hypothesis; Ecology; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Biology; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001558373,0.000161128,0.0001340441,0.00001464615,0.0001439027,0.0000441979,0.0001750699,0.00007763114,0.3150651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002322053,0.0001569378,0.00008123436,0.0001292143,0.0004237458,0.0003026689,0.000164199,0.00009307297,0.01043565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005529488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006060331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004744696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003209381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987125,0.00004108288,0.0001999119,0.0003666951,0.0003219691,0.0003577881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994335,0.00002238425,0.00005275522,0.000322441,0.000004501441,0.0001644715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004438897,0.002033606,0.7309035,0.00004353329,0.00003983464,0.0002411213,0.002921765,0.0002525139,0.1765086,0.01015465,0.0332935,0.04316347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002570388,0.0004003049,0.5140073,0.00002730593,0.00005586604,0.0002530279,0.006096749,0.003084274,0.004815181,0.004735216,0.4626821,0.001272215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7755308,0.00003579998,0.0002576669,0.0005718443,0.00008020586,0.0001665477,0.00009766244,0.00006808343,0.2231914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965616,0.0001385397,0.00008750301,0.0008406711,0.00002396875,0.00002539268,0.0001221701,0.00001189071,0.00218819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4293886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9903348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02868489217645588,"score_gpt":0.2539374193606245,"score_spread":0.2252525271841686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}