{"id":"W1982621550","doi":"10.1145/2523649.2523650","title":"Uncovering access control weaknesses and flaws with security-discordant software clones","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"clone (Java method); Computer science; Access control; Software security assurance; Perspective (graphical); Code (set theory); Software; Strengths and weaknesses; Computer security; Information security; Programming language; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Security service; Set (abstract data type); Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004344921,0.0007671677,0.000993052,0.005041445,0.001110928,0.002093781,0.0015546,0.001890189,0.0005970391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06690099,0.0008659191,0.0009139956,0.003058892,0.002420474,0.00464332,0.002397724,0.001501332,0.0001768078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001284067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001689958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002413274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002885036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930153,0.001200144,0.0005093854,0.001898362,0.002990982,0.0003857918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9075392,0.04301316,0.02376248,0.01614471,0.008481069,0.001059447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008489676,0.0005560569,0.6285934,0.0005822801,0.0004861112,0.004221832,0.01133609,0.03328777,0.09094197,0.0423075,0.0009673377,0.1858706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001604841,0.001031548,0.1850371,0.0003673378,0.001012415,0.01077798,0.00481239,0.571534,0.1295145,0.08901923,0.006449479,0.0002834736],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8872639,0.0002985595,0.1103915,0.0002280787,0.00001246328,0.0001387885,0.000128568,0.000686172,0.0008519064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287733,0.0000956665,0.07034339,0.00006607491,0.00001004589,0.00006102264,0.0001879558,0.00009650393,0.0003659535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005041445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02297843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00845662667992501,"score_gpt":0.2400267728745018,"score_spread":0.2315701461945768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}