{"id":"W1982621550","doi":"10.1145/2523649.2523650","title":"Uncovering access control weaknesses and flaws with security-discordant software clones","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"clone (Java method); Computer science; Access control; Software security assurance; Perspective (graphical); Code (set theory); Software; Strengths and weaknesses; Computer security; Information security; Programming language; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Security service; Set (abstract data type); Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001377046,0.000169504,0.0001900256,0.0001123651,0.0001023328,0.0009055956,0.0008388435,0.00003065817,0.0000578274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022724,0.000120271,0.00002173427,0.0003390553,0.00006180215,0.001756365,0.0004460721,0.0001561799,0.00004554035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002601644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006533429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005973448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005997693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987025,0.00002709959,0.0001371693,0.0003969177,0.0003464078,0.0003898857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984707,0.0007187268,0.00003055865,0.0004751233,0.0001373243,0.0001675734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005002347,0.0002071315,0.9169785,0.0006459358,0.000251772,0.0002844602,0.001307403,0.007040814,0.001577292,0.01253184,0.005556005,0.05356882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005986884,0.0009770923,0.8471304,0.0004753367,0.00003775004,0.0007309748,0.000245381,0.09519345,0.01779224,0.02313187,0.005646869,0.002651783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3820083,0.0001356281,0.6164131,0.0004781293,0.0001029747,0.0002659369,0.000001146652,0.0004867032,0.0001080946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732593,0.00001724072,0.0262853,0.000140496,0.0000425278,0.00009089066,6.326683e-7,0.00001723966,0.0001463537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.591251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8732679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00845662667992501,"score_gpt":0.2400267728745018,"score_spread":0.2315701461945768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}