{"id":"W1982870704","doi":"10.1162/glep.2006.6.2.1","title":"Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the Cartagena Protocol and the World Trade Organization","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Environmental Politics","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"Princeton University; Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars","keywords":"Structuring; Corporate governance; International trade; World trade; Protocol (science); International relations; Business; Political science; Economic system; Economics; Politics; Law; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001863561,0.0001332074,0.0001098651,0.00000886394,0.0006863615,0.00005710389,0.0002362417,0.00005750584,0.0001883575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004155303,0.00008447667,0.00004424509,0.0003957655,0.002143051,0.0002034298,0.0001260822,0.0001263826,0.00001054896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001385694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000724952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004724475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008365355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986295,0.0002712866,0.0003036997,0.000182192,0.0003687881,0.0002445041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999532,0.0000560574,0.0001747596,0.0001870618,0.000002927549,0.00004721899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000166422,0.0001740984,0.1384005,0.000006213315,0.00001125649,0.00001687838,0.0005660423,0.0005678709,0.00006642658,0.8594364,0.0004144067,0.0003233117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002285282,0.00001522189,0.9128298,0.00002324272,0.00005247591,0.0002941288,0.003015539,0.0001610573,0.0005846255,0.005535427,0.07499167,0.0002115237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433009,0.00008021363,0.00002892465,0.01693971,0.0003822925,0.01714586,0.0007061768,0.00003267614,0.02138324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987763,0.000008245886,0.00002574933,0.0004024165,0.0001628399,0.0003415865,0.00001508208,0.000007548737,0.0002602763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.853901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7896159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004128158859477111,"score_gpt":0.2392935790273069,"score_spread":0.2351654201678297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}