{"id":"W1982875108","doi":"10.1080/13552600.2013.870241","title":"Sex offender risk assessment with the Risk Matrix 2000: validation and guidelines for combining with the STABLE-2007","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sexual Aggression","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Public Safety Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Risk assessment; Incremental validity; Predictive validity; Psychology; Receiver operating characteristic; Sex offense; Risk management tools; Poison control; Risk analysis (engineering); Human factors and ergonomics; Computer science; Statistics; Clinical psychology; Computer security; Test validity; Medicine; Psychometrics; Sexual abuse; Mathematics; Medical emergency","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02594951,0.001162346,0.001066914,0.004269562,0.001001933,0.002281087,0.002095947,0.0005402016,0.002354312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06775105,0.0004910102,0.002035671,0.002708921,0.0007791655,0.001566218,0.001861885,0.001797945,0.001016792],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00297029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007138668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05634823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1270111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.98557,0.004831064,0.002367085,0.0007069466,0.00618967,0.0003352678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531921,0.01481242,0.005318367,0.003948853,0.02178963,0.0009385492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005993326,0.0008221842,0.5951841,0.0004256215,0.0004998255,0.0001363229,0.001314656,0.004471398,0.001309929,0.003950585,0.02034635,0.3709398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001664997,0.001442942,0.9269601,0.001064264,0.0003096592,0.0004931635,0.002009155,0.03369844,0.003560587,0.006165893,0.02390147,0.0002279087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7373299,0.001659955,0.1727877,0.003387824,0.0008254843,0.01537253,0.01048096,0.002659858,0.05549578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6059645,0.0011104,0.3683962,0.000393979,0.00009075494,0.006601656,0.0121232,0.0003112387,0.005008094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05634823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1372358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04078653935964505,"score_gpt":0.3681201825905902,"score_spread":0.3273336432309451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}