{"id":"W1982883591","doi":"10.1353/ken.2002.0021","title":"Report of the IOM Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Participants","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human services; Quarter (Canadian coin); Human research; Common Rule; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Law; Informed consent; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.573225,0.003498099,0.005506586,0.01292741,0.01291185,0.02444437,0.02209324,0.05469501,0.005625113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4652611,0.004525628,0.00682917,0.0133633,0.01325714,0.0103501,0.0156555,0.04089194,0.005344556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03363314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2302747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09650841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1153626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5275285,0.1689766,0.07297857,0.01072284,0.1960949,0.02369865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3898976,0.2193125,0.05114467,0.05018057,0.2454033,0.04406133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001987095,0.0004206536,0.008884954,0.001250751,0.0001940599,0.0002023709,0.002587359,0.0006963917,0.001143084,0.03506258,0.8973119,0.05204717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001899178,0.0003027871,0.01730948,0.00990572,0.0003521787,0.0002378197,0.002409782,0.001049986,0.002013432,0.009711783,0.9561254,0.0003916839],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01154083,0.02762103,0.04702615,0.6962586,0.0514001,0.03999562,0.009725309,0.001825551,0.1146068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03115707,0.01790502,0.3074706,0.4580795,0.01259767,0.0620857,0.01568617,0.001732162,0.09328607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.945305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5262896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8795710594181539,"score_gpt":0.6681001142595233,"score_spread":0.2114709451586306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}