{"id":"W1982902812","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-940x.2005.00099.x","title":"HOUSING POLICY ISSUES IN A RICH COUNTRY WITH HIGH POPULATION GROWTH: THE CASE OF RIYADH, SAUDI ARABIA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Allowance (engineering); Renting; Stock (firearms); Rental housing; Middle class; Economic growth; Investment (military); Population; Context (archaeology); Subdivision; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Political science; Operations management; Sociology; Politics; Market economy; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001001812,0.000204676,0.0002087324,0.0005669235,0.001563948,0.001986287,0.0005521018,0.0009201392,0.001254701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001014985,0.0001357601,0.000253575,0.001263907,0.0009565604,0.0008461117,0.0009362904,0.0005980124,0.0001542598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004108827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00273326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1730798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2492221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994774,0.0002847585,0.00001674755,0.00001953019,0.00004230673,0.0001592454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993201,0.0002115264,0.0001350674,0.00002034964,0.0001940553,0.0001188947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005541026,0.0006322591,0.3903384,0.003021702,0.0008830386,0.06971455,0.08019598,0.0212354,0.0039721,0.2336662,0.03776554,0.1580207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007457982,0.0003248039,0.5082068,0.0008983137,0.0004045424,0.006765641,0.3311737,0.009582895,0.00129644,0.01068299,0.1304801,0.0001090679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9588894,0.01604753,0.0003207094,0.01172714,0.00004807754,0.00002400481,0.0001232215,0.000005500756,0.0128143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871097,0.01061927,0.0002521898,0.0003949537,0.00003052421,0.000007402841,0.00004108478,0.000001510908,0.001543555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1730798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3441448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03575383530751614,"score_gpt":0.260358586163674,"score_spread":0.2246047508561579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}