{"id":"W1982991037","doi":"10.2495/wrm110601","title":"The method of material flow analysis, a tool for selecting sustainable sanitation technology options: the case of Pouytenga (Burkina Faso)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WIT transactions on ecology and the environment","topic":"Historical and Environmental Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eidgenössische Anstalt für Wasserversorgung Abwasserreinigung und Gewässerschutz; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Sanitation; Environmental science; Material flow analysis; Groundwater; Environmental engineering; Pollution; Wastewater; Water resource management; Agriculture; Waste management; Engineering; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001682465,0.0005315588,0.0003381598,0.003616883,0.001537995,0.001808302,0.0004334401,0.0008844146,0.001002355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002715573,0.0002231847,0.0003702697,0.002753748,0.0008504607,0.001511898,0.0006238096,0.0003545538,0.0001037297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001522449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001450705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0264906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03173338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992672,0.0004764845,0.0000329412,0.00006244374,0.0001051015,0.00005584889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998804,0.0009111323,0.0001225596,0.00003125837,0.0001045771,0.00002655775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006805886,0.0004722865,0.1893318,0.001453906,0.0002082735,0.01375054,0.01329188,0.06245415,0.03069572,0.07510213,0.002078249,0.6104805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001715099,0.001529208,0.2315492,0.001452371,0.0003506767,0.01010112,0.04932658,0.4300518,0.05236424,0.09927206,0.1233547,0.0004766648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.8246913,0.007364618,0.1412466,0.001436707,0.00005514139,0.0004916453,0.000548129,0.00009453264,0.02407132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8923171,0.002274678,0.1022514,0.00006638868,0.00001170792,0.0002217044,0.00008867536,0.00001420896,0.002754128],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0264906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0526728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01100200059824694,"score_gpt":0.2397661462817169,"score_spread":0.22876414568347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}