{"id":"W1983110074","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01451.x","title":"A large‐scale comparison of conventional and molecular methods for the evaluation of host–parasitoid associations in non‐target risk‐assessment studies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Insect-Plant Interactions and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Parasitoid; Biology; Parasitism; Host (biology); Biological pest control; Lygus; Ecology; Zoology; Miridae","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001827211,0.00005145975,0.0002906179,0.00002490365,0.0001360121,0.000003608433,0.00007119733,0.00005091484,0.00004354324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009183254,0.00002062057,0.00008179284,0.00008296988,0.00004557748,0.00003167086,0.00001638853,0.0001200419,1.924646e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004751149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003243704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001234804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003015356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991204,0.000169716,0.0004154602,0.00006401488,0.0001397474,0.00009072864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997704,0.001224515,0.0006477851,0.00001964407,0.00038953,0.00001457779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057058,0.001613493,0.3619669,0.00002072582,0.001034092,0.000001513972,0.003552462,0.004843145,0.6043328,0.002548724,0.001175948,0.01833962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00105054,0.0004601058,0.97203,0.000006350763,0.0001489879,0.000009367309,0.004126205,0.01169594,0.006463531,0.003528293,0.00043355,0.00004715157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997257,0.00036999,0.001355907,0.0004645439,0.0001298354,0.0002749182,0.0000366834,9.277924e-7,0.0001101881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958987,0.000117595,0.00385286,0.00004006654,0.00004248,0.00003773125,0.000006601356,4.381426e-7,0.000003518817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6100631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1046109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04775745567011599,"score_gpt":0.3987675198531292,"score_spread":0.3510100641830133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}