{"id":"W1983110074","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01451.x","title":"A large‐scale comparison of conventional and molecular methods for the evaluation of host–parasitoid associations in non‐target risk‐assessment studies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Insect-Plant Interactions and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Parasitoid; Biology; Parasitism; Host (biology); Biological pest control; Lygus; Ecology; Zoology; Miridae","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0168629,0.0006735181,0.0005743349,0.002368119,0.0004938368,0.001322005,0.001017114,0.0009252469,0.001379881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01243639,0.0003715003,0.0004878694,0.001273001,0.0006477531,0.0009007436,0.001030136,0.0007296799,0.0005919354],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000532169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004178392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001145031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002838894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9827071,0.009568723,0.0008682293,0.002340301,0.004163955,0.0003517759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864868,0.006083735,0.002067956,0.002043949,0.003005778,0.0003117576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002161002,0.002058962,0.1695877,0.001521884,0.0009172066,0.0002061501,0.0009206547,0.002220655,0.6341366,0.001352495,0.001538943,0.1833778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002044645,0.005645695,0.8068393,0.0002954322,0.000689246,0.001051268,0.0008927782,0.01980565,0.1475054,0.001039219,0.01587429,0.0001572961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8191212,0.005665013,0.1637846,0.0002403495,0.0002093391,0.002171326,0.002172369,0.0004984641,0.006137259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7706217,0.001242383,0.2205126,0.0002353837,0.00005831425,0.002324537,0.002396366,0.0001082801,0.002500349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0168629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08918059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04775745567011599,"score_gpt":0.3987675198531292,"score_spread":0.3510100641830133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}