{"id":"W1983122291","doi":"10.1080/15459624.2012.760391","title":"Assessment of the Contribution of Electron Microscopy to Nanoparticle Characterization Sampled with Two Cascade Impactors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail; Polytechnique Montréal; Université de Montréal; Sante Montreal","funders":"Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'Environnement et du Travail; Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail","keywords":"Transmission electron microscopy; Nanoparticle; Scanning electron microscope; Characterization (materials science); Materials science; Nanotechnology; Particle (ecology); Microscopy; Electron microscope; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Chemistry; Composite material; Optics; Chromatography; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002499416,0.00008359226,0.0001614572,0.00002893812,0.00008329293,0.000009527093,0.00009027755,0.00002725695,0.0002900473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002092026,0.00005182283,0.0000365088,0.0001080603,0.0001319489,0.000315623,0.00005121264,0.00008128384,0.000004235156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002064111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003521855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000158848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002157703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989222,0.00006499112,0.0003836463,0.00008447471,0.0003881865,0.0001564953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992897,0.00003988163,0.0004428815,0.00008328995,0.00001401675,0.000130227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000920435,0.0001008895,0.4227114,0.000003668507,0.000008261841,1.329398e-7,0.0001254717,0.0006249884,0.5758033,0.00002890781,0.00002837426,0.0004725871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005123155,0.0004922051,0.8174033,0.00002161149,0.00001399466,0.0000163006,0.00004581367,0.0003276424,0.1809486,0.00004567219,0.000124487,0.00004806322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976087,0.00001052226,0.00146609,0.0006088707,0.00003485351,0.0002238099,0.00003052186,0.000001250958,0.00001534177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983795,0.00001776222,0.001185099,0.0003585693,0.00002019765,0.000003717223,0.00001282075,0.000004801487,0.0000175138],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3948546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3175815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01450632529122498,"score_gpt":0.3121360968243517,"score_spread":0.2976297715331268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}