{"id":"W1983155329","doi":"10.1080/02331930008844509","title":"A path-following cutting plane method for some monotone variational inequalities<sup>∗</sup>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Optimization","topic":"Optimization and Variational Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Monotone polygon; Variational inequality; Cutting-plane method; Path (computing); Affine transformation; Operator (biology); Plane (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Strongly monotone; Regular polygon; Point (geometry); Combinatorics; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Pure mathematics; Geometry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001506374,0.001094148,0.0008391421,0.0008411386,0.0006090721,0.0008891222,0.001286947,0.001275002,0.006820611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001939276,0.0005818307,0.001010057,0.0008318112,0.0008284927,0.001496316,0.001336197,0.003076066,0.0009634923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007868839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001184757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001861281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001770903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994087,0.0001429077,0.00003204554,0.0001310279,0.0002382302,0.00004706128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994465,0.0002845876,0.000039145,0.00005460097,0.0001410171,0.00003408549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001628921,0.0002061548,0.0006887983,0.000437289,0.00009522451,0.0002080925,0.0002174021,0.1835189,0.02172927,0.2352109,0.005558928,0.5519662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004107551,0.0001286802,0.0001945761,0.00003523558,0.00002343684,0.0001569685,0.00002046905,0.9353724,0.00525127,0.05001301,0.008739598,0.00002331543],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001106584,0.00006032161,0.9981213,0.00003683446,0.00001048333,0.00003350245,0.00001475281,0.00004656148,0.0005696128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02700518,0.00015012,0.970648,0.00004614537,0.00002466604,0.0001704489,0.0001179554,0.00006791851,0.00176965],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006820611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02281725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01633240886666431,"score_gpt":0.2697094271933224,"score_spread":0.2533770183266581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}