{"id":"W1983252164","doi":"10.1016/j.aca.2012.09.049","title":"Measuring the molecular second hyperpolarizability in absorptive solutions by the third harmonic generation ratio technique","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytica Chimica Acta","topic":"Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hyperpolarizability; Chemistry; Refractive index; Wavelength; Second-harmonic generation; Absorption (acoustics); Refractometer; Harmonic; Optics; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Optoelectronics; Molecule; Laser; Chromatography; Organic chemistry; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006502455,0.0001676436,0.0001804738,0.00003863646,0.0001771733,0.00006306014,0.0002261168,0.00007972636,0.00006569516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001665271,0.0001078511,0.00005839778,0.0002052232,0.0001218171,0.00017452,0.00009549613,0.0002988504,0.00003671141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000131138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001795744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001437251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007716691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989055,0.000115895,0.0002738243,0.0001561329,0.0001522704,0.0003963633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999362,0.0001296696,0.0000309069,0.0003874564,0.00003786773,0.00005211935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002354509,0.00003695433,0.000138949,0.00001286852,0.00005873744,2.061636e-7,0.0002229723,0.00002380367,0.9973758,0.001121168,0.000986633,0.00001958858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001787552,0.00002151092,0.00520024,0.00001736644,0.0001238756,0.00001018964,0.0001152848,0.03142972,0.959812,0.0005779727,0.002187708,0.0003253185],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917362,0.0002588639,0.001856933,0.002063561,0.0001823147,0.0006367182,0.00003382081,0.0001878907,0.003043719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989645,0.00004716595,0.0005327728,0.0001327154,0.0001353945,0.0001212819,0.000008481227,0.00003086593,0.0000268397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0375637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4398042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02735218903044841,"score_gpt":0.2268984557965761,"score_spread":0.1995462667661277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}