{"id":"W1983437520","doi":"10.1108/13590791011033926","title":"Corruption and ethical relativism: what is at stake?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Guanxi; Cultural relativism; Normative; Phenomenon; Language change; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Originality; Meaning (existential); Construct (python library); Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Moral relativism; Business ethics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Social science; Economics; Human rights; China; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02335602,0.0003719529,0.0008295177,0.001997086,0.005142204,0.01001679,0.001137306,0.004133754,0.002295006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04799867,0.0002747964,0.0004398033,0.002088918,0.05525655,0.01241715,0.005201804,0.005616781,0.0002362196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00697178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00659375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002671306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002465453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9704183,0.02292809,0.0006212915,0.001150444,0.00282632,0.002055528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9399149,0.03751153,0.01137556,0.003177834,0.005052397,0.002967807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004811335,0.00008682062,0.01140358,0.0003862142,0.00004807295,0.0003561553,0.02149304,0.0003722247,0.0001699442,0.9395861,0.002375242,0.02367454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002483738,0.00007534386,0.01044806,0.001825113,0.00006432988,0.0006297689,0.06740586,0.001231953,0.000397926,0.8802621,0.03756775,0.00006710207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.291948,0.03540369,0.02509125,0.3631417,0.002203388,0.0001403382,0.00005412064,0.00006552903,0.2819519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938203,0.001976678,0.0007188286,0.002509328,0.0003353842,0.00001800941,0.000005551753,0.000007330133,0.0006087415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02335602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1235199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1775039597536541,"score_gpt":0.4273215610103274,"score_spread":0.2498176012566733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}