{"id":"W1983437520","doi":"10.1108/13590791011033926","title":"Corruption and ethical relativism: what is at stake?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Guanxi; Cultural relativism; Normative; Phenomenon; Language change; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Originality; Meaning (existential); Construct (python library); Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Moral relativism; Business ethics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Social science; Economics; Human rights; China; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005257409,0.0000861044,0.0002275653,0.0001859478,0.0002344162,0.0003714238,0.0002618198,0.0004058942,0.0004901179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01039035,0.0000604837,0.00008548131,0.0002728034,0.0001953437,0.0007658512,0.00006976338,0.001479897,0.00008005254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003250795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000367845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009920956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004899886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978912,0.00009466815,0.0006422845,0.0001671565,0.001067691,0.0001369402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965326,0.001313741,0.0005860386,0.0002146476,0.001231186,0.0001218181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006289292,0.0002476152,0.06474203,0.00003858672,0.00001912773,0.00006927573,0.02517662,0.00001435861,0.0437713,0.1590296,0.1750062,0.5312564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003360369,0.0001384651,0.6389497,0.00008028247,0.00001963589,0.0002247096,0.0003933155,0.00005727253,0.00138383,0.2646746,0.09361076,0.0001313858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725162,0.0004116131,0.001136797,0.01992931,0.005206185,0.00003871933,0.000001690245,0.000003711802,0.00075577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942947,0.0003889838,0.001547357,0.001986072,0.0007873373,5.456724e-7,3.447934e-7,0.000006222137,0.0009884456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5742077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1775039597536541,"score_gpt":0.4273215610103274,"score_spread":0.2498176012566733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}