{"id":"W1983488863","doi":"10.1007/s11077-010-9118-y","title":"Grizzly Bear conservation in the Foothills Model Forest: appraisal of a collaborative ecosystem management effort","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Sciences","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Saskatchewan; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Foothills; Grizzly Bears; Negotiation; Legislature; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Ecosystem-based management; Ecosystem services; Forest management; Ecosystem management; Business; Ecosystem; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Forestry; Environmental science; Ursus","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05635447,0.0006719557,0.0009042309,0.00277358,0.006614459,0.003887598,0.003864013,0.003057347,0.003071018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07681723,0.0003478601,0.001297498,0.002204277,0.002363466,0.002466266,0.006205816,0.001576522,0.0001981549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01518271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03067064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1131749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2365244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9669896,0.01795988,0.001295672,0.001475315,0.00960546,0.002674045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9148973,0.04760524,0.00571636,0.006011795,0.01668585,0.009083489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01395703,0.01393811,0.3737915,0.001555798,0.001653976,0.002283259,0.01224638,0.03258137,0.002735069,0.02347453,0.01380882,0.5079741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005393439,0.0168505,0.8598677,0.001073799,0.003017859,0.000701213,0.03605044,0.04537625,0.00304784,0.006482935,0.02184376,0.0002942628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654446,0.001316015,0.001977518,0.006887131,0.0001396909,0.001743535,0.0002520883,0.00003933847,0.0222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905016,0.0006211332,0.005834865,0.0006827899,0.000108601,0.0006946249,0.0002330723,0.00001405192,0.001309161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8868251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2980345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01380604346705253,"score_gpt":0.2790457784590442,"score_spread":0.2652397349919916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}