{"id":"W1983525564","doi":"10.1108/01604951311295049","title":"The Southern Agrarians: a case study in intellectualized collection development","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collection Building","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Value (mathematics); Narrative; Sociology; Work (physics); Agrarianism; Collection development; Collections management; Perspective (graphical); Library science; World Wide Web; Public relations; Computer science; Social science; Political science; Qualitative research; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007893058,0.0001821566,0.0002570616,0.001035411,0.00296148,0.001587514,0.0007867133,0.0000905564,0.0005237331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007026356,0.0001124592,0.00007753332,0.007470243,0.0001610086,0.0005245754,0.0002187253,0.000459063,0.0004476926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004411709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004854208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004277305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009342374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954035,0.0008663606,0.0009535251,0.0006644719,0.001557758,0.0005543942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959458,0.00280427,0.0002120024,0.0004064807,0.0004644036,0.0001670961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004300109,0.00095784,0.2824371,0.00001065993,0.0001345885,0.0005243013,0.2273071,0.001604422,0.006631032,0.0003583138,0.1551402,0.3244645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005282513,0.000705876,0.05853355,0.00008885998,0.00002061208,0.001686848,0.7036089,0.1075076,0.003921081,0.02192149,0.09552948,0.001193195],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898319,0.0001007021,0.004935334,0.0005694315,0.0006105237,0.00142188,3.706728e-7,0.0000611971,0.002468707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736967,0.00002130518,0.0006569903,0.00005688352,0.00006918222,0.0004199676,1.647407e-7,0.0000127909,0.02506601],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4763018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1437628486972637,"score_gpt":0.4116840670608461,"score_spread":0.2679212183635824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}