{"id":"W1983575886","doi":"10.1177/0539018404042581","title":"Compromise and Public Debate in Processes of Constitutional Reform: the Canadian Case","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Information","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Compromise; Negotiation; Law and economics; Political science; Outcome (game theory); Law; Economics; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008217184,0.00004114076,0.00006411215,0.0001613778,0.003566069,0.0001377441,0.0001368186,0.00003642826,0.000007151189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004888948,0.0000304512,0.00001119398,0.001226996,0.007700538,0.001725904,0.00002892034,0.00006227526,0.000004508397],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007557439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005782939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6347646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.865705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991636,0.00001521757,0.0001635317,0.00005420963,0.0003733225,0.0002301752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994643,0.00002108494,0.00007377844,0.00002534827,0.0003352716,0.00008023294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001527922,0.000005314162,0.001673844,0.000003172924,0.000001727175,0.000002527228,0.01879964,0.00001379634,0.000002177879,0.9765608,0.000005414945,0.00293004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002018608,0.00008597816,0.167068,0.0001470455,0.00004349295,0.0001956839,0.4295594,0.0001961779,0.0001436472,0.3047925,0.0949733,0.0007761415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.70476,0.00005432876,0.00005181562,0.01134164,0.0001490355,0.0002722482,0.00002635469,0.00001563488,0.283329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996059,0.00002488906,0.00002265856,0.0002979085,0.00003277274,0.00001114099,0.000002638183,3.504977e-7,0.000001726043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6717683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03146526936316905,"score_gpt":0.2894881052640831,"score_spread":0.2580228359009141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}