{"id":"W1983575886","doi":"10.1177/0539018404042581","title":"Compromise and Public Debate in Processes of Constitutional Reform: the Canadian Case","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Information","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Compromise; Negotiation; Law and economics; Political science; Outcome (game theory); Law; Economics; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02024847,0.0007129598,0.000987741,0.0029248,0.06678,0.01870264,0.004159122,0.01797574,0.007801894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03984623,0.0006868159,0.001078683,0.006133085,0.04066758,0.009743302,0.00960987,0.01161053,0.0005904326],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2089993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1710662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9666591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9723905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9663957,0.008529903,0.000597293,0.002256018,0.01062744,0.01159358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875459,0.006443038,0.0006609012,0.0009633082,0.002919285,0.001467486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003861166,0.00002360191,0.0006152237,0.00002380543,0.00000748926,0.000468075,0.01268486,0.0008537532,0.0001534068,0.9775933,0.003835399,0.003702536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004610469,0.0001121346,0.006311438,0.0003790559,0.0001473342,0.0004906934,0.05225971,0.007565836,0.001340876,0.5084993,0.4221092,0.000323305],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.165947,0.004188367,0.006964723,0.09748443,0.0003437675,0.0003100815,0.000160952,0.00008596606,0.7245147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616889,0.0009797894,0.001813663,0.004432123,0.0001069009,0.0001267615,0.00003542247,0.00002662416,0.03078984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7910007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9174486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03146526936316905,"score_gpt":0.2894881052640831,"score_spread":0.2580228359009141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}