{"id":"W1983582792","doi":"10.1080/13510347.2012.709687","title":"Uncertainty and the epistemic dimension of democratic deliberation in climate change adaptation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Democratization","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"George Washington University","keywords":"Deliberation; Democracy; Dimension (graph theory); Climate change; Epistemology; Adaptation (eye); Deliberative democracy; Uncertainty quantification; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Positive economics; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Mathematics; Psychology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0248317,0.0004737064,0.0006963726,0.00181143,0.006796592,0.01132347,0.001160799,0.004466482,0.004728984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03704361,0.0004753552,0.0009985047,0.001304222,0.04523195,0.01217629,0.01184265,0.005882273,0.0003399374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00632089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004893997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002873546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00240546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9713505,0.02169089,0.0009696719,0.001677617,0.002441215,0.001870214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9402992,0.04731867,0.004018398,0.003515384,0.003193884,0.001654505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002169934,0.00001122291,0.0004157513,0.00003048411,0.00001053091,0.00006140073,0.00390544,0.002172862,0.00006946291,0.9906682,0.0003480764,0.002284828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008514387,0.000007987976,0.0001940612,0.00004304949,0.000006788326,0.00002549183,0.001398748,0.001685094,0.00008677043,0.9919631,0.004567982,0.00001227559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1355698,0.002872515,0.2276348,0.06831889,0.0005822239,0.0001427694,0.0001180864,0.0001009916,0.5646599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941084,0.0002368864,0.003613071,0.0005708019,0.00007727546,0.00005604042,0.00001058901,0.00001064662,0.001316289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0248317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1313241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02091563678804235,"score_gpt":0.2226626808203049,"score_spread":0.2017470440322625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}