{"id":"W1983600708","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.01.039","title":"72: A Method for Review of Accuracy and Reliability of Canadian Emergency Department Triage Acuity Scale-Based Triage Process in a Community Emergency Department Setting: Starting the QI Process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Emergency Medicine","topic":"Emergency and Acute Care Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Triage; Emergency department; Medicine; Medical emergency; Reliability (semiconductor); Scale (ratio); Emergency medicine; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1553922,0.002821329,0.006426519,0.02887612,0.00326305,0.004386506,0.005402842,0.001920984,0.009074801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3898985,0.002728183,0.01327587,0.02886424,0.002134017,0.003611867,0.004076268,0.002201538,0.001294188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01379522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04064927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1027172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1691618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7415543,0.1000686,0.08946873,0.009169897,0.0578412,0.001897217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5523434,0.2536097,0.05055271,0.02417726,0.1176113,0.00170568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004679537,0.0002479426,0.06981056,0.2844764,0.06025417,0.0003871107,0.01102427,0.0009136806,0.002591684,0.00774682,0.09235226,0.4655155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01077245,0.002184809,0.3336184,0.1442603,0.1490516,0.001218647,0.004501491,0.003627662,0.00567504,0.005607439,0.3375109,0.001971305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08254337,0.4239275,0.1456095,0.01195523,0.009111198,0.1560248,0.1187761,0.004518976,0.04753341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2757239,0.06236626,0.4067391,0.003793138,0.001275276,0.2212359,0.01623148,0.001967284,0.01066764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1553922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8218023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1472787031421725,"score_gpt":0.4502963682243517,"score_spread":0.3030176650821792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}