{"id":"W1983631841","doi":"10.1108/17544401011052276","title":"The distributional impact of income tax in Canada and China: 1997‐2005","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Gross income; China; State income tax; International taxation; Income distribution; Public economics; Personal income; Income tax; Distribution (mathematics); Tax reform; Double taxation; Demographic economics; Macroeconomics; Geography; Inequality","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006202554,0.0001614582,0.0006379637,0.0001060822,0.0001181801,0.00002705384,0.0001590814,0.00004744652,0.00001795561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001324185,0.0001093579,0.0001303829,0.00004331439,0.0002289257,0.0002354281,0.00005648868,0.0002952933,0.000001121899],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002891023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001784374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05463551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2528853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986387,0.000009723122,0.0009577241,0.0001393866,0.00002090169,0.0002335349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988728,0.0002126078,0.0006973424,0.0001084628,0.000008778601,0.00009997093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000516333,0.00001232155,0.940384,0.00001769683,0.0002252208,0.000002457099,0.0002179444,0.00005453599,0.000003403748,0.05802166,0.0007429609,0.0002662022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005698568,0.00005754978,0.7720879,0.000007731573,0.000004382834,0.00005642661,0.00009728524,0.0005496315,0.000003238279,0.2260944,0.0003783696,0.00009322174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992227,0.004182843,0.000004244678,0.001149264,0.0003286093,0.0000611357,0.0004286829,0.000001203523,0.001616973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983608,0.001303646,0.00003189848,0.00002555747,0.000249329,0.00000240317,0.000001982715,0.000008489883,0.00001595827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1982498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9516597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01092323126745951,"score_gpt":0.2306226676972467,"score_spread":0.2196994364297871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}