{"id":"W1983705529","doi":"10.1109/wpc.2005.26","title":"On Evaluating the Layout of UML Class Diagrams for Program Comprehension","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Class diagram; Story-driven modeling; Computer science; Unified Modeling Language; Communication diagram; UML tool; Applications of UML; Class (philosophy); Readability; Program comprehension; Programming language; Flowchart; Activity diagram; Software engineering; Perspective (graphical); Software; Software system; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01472677,0.001681237,0.0009885136,0.005005447,0.001115514,0.003262282,0.001161303,0.001519257,0.004157904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2116418,0.0003617163,0.0006172098,0.003499572,0.0009420872,0.005442614,0.001391387,0.0007343076,0.0009553355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001646116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001859467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003707707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004718425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9832977,0.009046803,0.001425258,0.0009480231,0.004851275,0.0004309048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7082745,0.2378496,0.01140176,0.005765543,0.03414372,0.002564904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002169383,0.001448604,0.02905341,0.002622494,0.0001639907,0.0004263107,0.007337299,0.02624054,0.05629541,0.006275374,0.006486083,0.8614811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001430044,0.01510429,0.2009156,0.002618838,0.0009871123,0.001494867,0.01492475,0.4615376,0.2324544,0.02474442,0.04313739,0.0006507642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6635483,0.002158515,0.3136453,0.0005948742,0.0001744549,0.001774779,0.0006633676,0.004312945,0.01312757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6542771,0.0009003417,0.3397363,0.0001009152,0.00004911823,0.0007546811,0.001591952,0.0009490523,0.00164047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01472677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07788354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07198969455712151,"score_gpt":0.3881060347463051,"score_spread":0.3161163401891836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}