{"id":"W1983705529","doi":"10.1109/wpc.2005.26","title":"On Evaluating the Layout of UML Class Diagrams for Program Comprehension","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Class diagram; Story-driven modeling; Computer science; Unified Modeling Language; Communication diagram; UML tool; Applications of UML; Class (philosophy); Readability; Program comprehension; Programming language; Flowchart; Activity diagram; Software engineering; Perspective (graphical); Software; Software system; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005984282,0.00007393293,0.00008968339,0.0000452891,0.00006642543,0.00006035755,0.0006203682,0.00003119236,0.000008101762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005854478,0.00004528141,0.00005495395,0.0002185424,0.00002995248,0.00008982569,0.0001454459,0.0001014905,0.00002187251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002962553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003145838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007709777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005152689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989855,0.00003782606,0.0001434307,0.0001929565,0.0004122708,0.0002279581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974505,0.001871104,0.00003195044,0.00047744,0.00012863,0.00004032698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001137523,0.0001352032,0.0006322955,0.00002382808,0.00001158537,2.107653e-7,0.0002188407,0.02610426,0.0007823143,0.0291412,0.001171391,0.9417675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002582952,0.0006577336,0.007234024,0.00001912573,0.000001868145,9.750597e-7,0.000005320291,0.9875155,0.001818173,0.00041383,0.00200975,0.00006537737],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.523345,0.0000534797,0.4727381,0.00195571,0.000155194,0.0009607666,7.175685e-7,0.000416224,0.0003747825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8563318,6.207774e-7,0.1432011,0.00008986234,0.00005695146,0.0001087098,7.111194e-7,0.000007215157,0.000203041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9614112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1846522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07198969455712151,"score_gpt":0.3881060347463051,"score_spread":0.3161163401891836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}