{"id":"W1983722296","doi":"10.1007/s10457-008-9126-5","title":"External economic benefits and social goods from prairie shelterbelts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agroforestry Systems","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Windbreak; Valuation (finance); Agriculture; Natural resource economics; Business; Cost–benefit analysis; Carbon sequestration; Agricultural economics; Ecosystem services; Resource (disambiguation); Health benefits; Agroforestry; Geography; Environmental science; Economics; Ecology; Ecosystem","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008794889,0.0003096738,0.0003089637,0.0006383579,0.0006745855,0.002064676,0.0003566206,0.0007589741,0.01054385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003358362,0.0002237907,0.0002960133,0.0009923696,0.001356379,0.001523502,0.001366153,0.0007235546,0.0003236092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001491664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003760667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008034138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02441897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996039,0.000165805,0.00001472642,0.00004483112,0.00004884538,0.0001218679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984919,0.0006177959,0.0003121193,0.0001301457,0.0001569063,0.0002912395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001875406,0.001073021,0.7159505,0.0002702083,0.0004422913,0.001759845,0.003011093,0.07523894,0.006108065,0.1122925,0.002307371,0.07967076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011309,0.0007066409,0.8527487,0.0001328609,0.0002783168,0.0004940559,0.01092094,0.03651845,0.001593017,0.08846603,0.007980876,0.00004705459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98818,0.0001459948,0.0008557103,0.0002790879,0.000007394151,0.000009307631,0.0001665641,0.000005094741,0.01035074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981626,0.00006513888,0.0001649494,0.00001918296,0.000005635228,0.000002637357,0.00006102354,0.000001991745,0.001516893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01054385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03527272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08956988649169052,"score_gpt":0.2081034715046456,"score_spread":0.118533585012955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}