{"id":"W1983795462","doi":"10.1007/s10552-006-0107-6","title":"Dietary fiber intake and ovarian cancer risk: a prospective cohort study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cancer Causes & Control","topic":"Cancer Risks and Factors","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Medicine; Prospective cohort study; Ovarian cancer; Hazard ratio; Proportional hazards model; Quartile; Cohort study; Internal medicine; Cancer; Epidemiology; Population; Breast cancer; Confidence interval; Oncology; Gynecology; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003876119,0.0003006811,0.0006605224,0.000116998,0.0001634137,0.00003701667,0.00007776968,0.0001068798,0.00107707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006104726,0.0002424109,0.0001077793,0.0002336025,0.0001409092,0.0001133911,0.00003655193,0.000419599,0.00001489948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005148061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002624652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02723715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02276692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981592,0.00004272214,0.0003706226,0.0005916196,0.0003519225,0.0004838707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988369,0.0001079006,0.0001750552,0.0003679537,0.0002026023,0.0003096218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001528682,0.0001948391,0.9425566,0.00002744394,0.001098731,0.00009345652,0.001283239,0.00001200989,0.0002723399,0.000005252134,0.0008772946,0.05205009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007693975,0.0005298367,0.9777166,0.00007481343,0.001457299,0.00001238245,0.0005073817,0.00005160684,0.0001808283,0.000022982,0.01148109,0.0002712028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875612,0.006752819,0.00007126828,0.000392597,0.0005627497,0.003021155,0.000196609,0.0001047243,0.001336872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952617,0.001093055,0.00002898792,0.0008180783,0.0009344073,0.0006679536,0.000005631117,0.00005234035,0.001137878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05177888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01561264862510023,"score_gpt":0.3115113264340079,"score_spread":0.2958986778089077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}