{"id":"W1983869662","doi":"10.5558/tfc791067-6","title":"Environmental assessment of forestry in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Key (lock); Forestry; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Business; Forest management; Environmental impact assessment; Community forestry; Computer science; Geography; Environmental science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009036617,0.0003168816,0.0002351042,0.003344883,0.003301203,0.002534876,0.0005341641,0.0002837262,0.004994691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001836352,0.000146918,0.0002507642,0.005641029,0.0005397234,0.0005804877,0.000912339,0.0004685095,0.0004245366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0525637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1083048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980298,0.0001180427,0.00004442982,0.00006223973,0.001551157,0.0001943372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980106,0.00007157848,0.00003876039,0.00001814298,0.001727095,0.0001338348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001358824,0.0001395838,0.08875042,0.0008220471,0.0001226469,0.0006913805,0.001814965,0.03389572,0.002721053,0.05986891,0.2297228,0.5813146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001719636,0.00003823419,0.2417814,0.000506178,0.00005258581,0.0001616288,0.003163154,0.01327976,0.001741185,0.00886969,0.7302935,0.00009544881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1764882,0.02219542,0.008693057,0.01147758,0.0003362948,0.0006170373,0.02660627,0.0005576573,0.7530285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7695525,0.02063128,0.02354124,0.00152091,0.00007307115,0.0001935114,0.0111469,0.0001488752,0.1731917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0525637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3813782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008162469994967812,"score_gpt":0.2439461006797178,"score_spread":0.23578363068475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}