{"id":"W1984016890","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.11.020","title":"Virtue ethics as an alternative to deontological and consequential reasoning in the harm reduction debate","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Drug Policy","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University; St. Francis Xavier University; Atlantic Industries (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Harm reduction; Virtue; Harm; Psychological intervention; Abstinence; Compassion; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Political science; Law and economics; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Philosophy; Public health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03615796,0.0007837539,0.001797032,0.002153158,0.007199368,0.01152214,0.003230634,0.01866672,0.006026077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04059142,0.0008478949,0.001881276,0.001539704,0.05607253,0.01775103,0.006609551,0.01960359,0.0006766549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007705646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007051508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003446143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002817985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9690883,0.02309425,0.000747417,0.00171173,0.003838266,0.001519961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598991,0.03293413,0.001057085,0.003231015,0.001909521,0.0009691844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003914594,0.000003629957,0.000009827201,0.000005149515,0.000001684852,0.000005776949,0.0001054474,0.00008199178,0.000007239134,0.9990403,0.0003305561,0.0004044957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006727425,0.00000217521,0.000009444057,0.000009004127,0.000001290472,0.000005189937,0.00003444857,0.0002393701,0.00001207275,0.9974949,0.002182742,0.000002661011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02117307,0.008095076,0.1721245,0.2656703,0.003585865,0.0000985368,0.0001023273,0.0001014942,0.5290487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9316986,0.001381307,0.02732496,0.01867376,0.003232059,0.0002647346,0.00003332862,0.0001158863,0.01727538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03615796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1912239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09161348452479637,"score_gpt":0.4403788618753908,"score_spread":0.3487653773505944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}