{"id":"W1984129771","doi":"10.1598/rrq.46.2.5","title":"Issues in Second‐Language Reading: Implications for Acquisition and Instruction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Humanities; Reading comprehension; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001424358,0.0001287627,0.0001838003,0.0006537647,0.0002039196,0.00008977613,0.0001690842,0.0001293742,0.0003611711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005099076,0.0001285087,0.00003639383,0.0003793897,0.0001051908,0.0002514769,0.00001691155,0.0002632756,0.00009202591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001232228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003166336,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006805456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007069106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983071,0.0002114512,0.000322219,0.0004659298,0.0001432834,0.0005500243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990467,0.0002727627,0.00006031894,0.000359464,0.0001329136,0.0001277772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003727336,0.0002435264,0.06057329,0.000147491,0.00008612766,0.00002695324,0.3712574,6.259504e-8,0.01616337,0.1086855,0.007574277,0.4348693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001564396,0.001183216,0.9304919,0.0001860636,0.000009347023,0.0001200657,0.02459296,0.00003466627,0.00156219,0.03087062,0.00903913,0.0003453913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800165,0.0002464972,0.0002908943,0.0004038805,0.0001959953,0.000560492,0.00002203993,0.00007191887,0.01819173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910112,0.00001387597,0.002032348,0.00003342753,0.0001367194,0.0004637604,0.00004021937,0.00002730803,0.006241125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8699186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5240435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07792822985849499,"score_gpt":0.4213477156598346,"score_spread":0.3434194858013396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}