{"id":"W1984207056","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a004862","title":"Methodological Artifacts in Measures of Political Efficacy and Trust: A Multiple Correspondence Analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Analysis","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political efficacy; Set (abstract data type); Test (biology); Social psychology; Psychology; National election; Political science; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002139474,0.0001704461,0.0009108363,0.0007839593,0.0001564883,0.0000593988,0.0001916279,0.000217062,0.0004970091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008413156,0.0001432344,0.0003704799,0.004231814,0.000735282,0.0001261266,0.00004959442,0.0001983089,0.00001944954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000175376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009159532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08599621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03878999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951081,0.001889058,0.0007004222,0.0004219256,0.0006539529,0.001226602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946746,0.003911417,0.00009516271,0.0002541779,0.000184561,0.0008801474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005135169,0.0001256293,0.5868566,0.000004987442,0.0003623452,0.000008896258,0.0002648999,0.00008254035,0.00008405232,0.4119065,0.000002602628,0.0002495687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003091065,0.00007141384,0.975839,0.000009400289,0.00238941,9.60692e-7,0.0005322519,0.006423503,0.0001718127,0.01371075,0.0003453061,0.0001971043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859465,0.00006783889,0.006047269,0.003164747,0.00002835338,0.0001597153,0.00001425513,0.00003788177,0.004533449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989272,0.00000690224,0.000401913,0.0002348365,0.0001036776,0.00001697494,0.000008440298,0.000006105946,0.0002939209],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3981958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999394,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3002946878885215,"score_gpt":0.4518279470052258,"score_spread":0.1515332591167043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}