{"id":"W1984275600","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v6i1.2822","title":"Building equitable community-academic research collaborations: Learning together through tensions and contradictions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"General partnership; Ambivalence; Reflexivity; Public relations; Alliance; Focus group; Sociology; Stakeholder; Process (computing); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04999455,0.0001338334,0.0002311342,0.0006218186,0.01661212,0.0008162552,0.00148753,0.0001353342,0.000315181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005699003,0.0001280984,0.00004880312,0.0007268102,0.001172215,0.0009931956,0.001458382,0.01371061,0.00002567599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003865248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003332693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02597005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001442622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9662098,0.03075939,0.0005030747,0.00009500356,0.001770074,0.0006626837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860291,0.008598312,0.0001814137,0.0003403796,0.004555766,0.0002949914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000272469,0.001698159,0.01159581,0.0001042158,0.001001823,0.00002299369,0.6491591,0.000979548,0.0122132,0.2316129,0.03015991,0.06117995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008757463,0.0006790769,0.005728988,0.0003029208,0.00001573828,0.00001722452,0.6882706,0.0001033231,0.0001832288,0.06948978,0.2341883,0.0001450341],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9563524,0.001083772,0.0006798916,0.01653792,0.0002684514,0.0004055783,0.000004614644,0.00004365324,0.02462373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885345,0.007721594,0.002214212,0.0002838591,0.0002394702,0.00004958967,0.000008833726,0.00001905713,0.0009288994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2040284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4090382142354676,"score_gpt":0.5037369855164683,"score_spread":0.09469877128100068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}