{"id":"W1984327806","doi":"10.1175/2011jcli3898.1","title":"Nonlinearity of Carbon Cycle Feedbacks","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Climate","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Victoria; Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences","keywords":"Carbon cycle; Environmental science; Carbon sink; Carbon fibers; Climate change; Climatology; Earth system science; Greenhouse gas; Climate model; Global change; Atmospheric sciences; Ecology; Mathematics; Geology; Ecosystem; Oceanography; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002387917,0.00007906981,0.000176064,0.000005418157,0.00002427555,0.000002872216,0.0001797657,0.00004628162,0.0008431946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009659332,0.00006327758,0.00008723113,0.00006848529,0.0001556483,0.0001209231,0.0001148656,0.0001259717,0.00002171551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006682408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004383958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001496612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009998252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991621,0.00002119129,0.0003497362,0.00007191219,0.0002340766,0.0001610021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994276,0.00001111642,0.0003563538,0.0001162757,0.000005018686,0.00008370625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001831857,0.0004652512,0.9651446,0.00001849112,0.0000336904,0.00004880086,0.001090792,0.0131211,0.005365171,0.00005303218,0.00003127415,0.01444457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007386769,0.000522989,0.9816514,0.00003447513,0.00007284062,0.0001178483,0.0004504865,0.01120649,0.002923932,0.001263956,0.0008169285,0.000199928],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599288,0.00002547109,0.0003628796,0.00002040683,0.0001167392,0.00002934599,0.000001133316,0.000003659876,0.03951154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743862,0.0003081352,0.02515639,0.00004545514,0.00002586031,2.488712e-7,1.758503e-7,0.000009345115,0.00006816984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03944337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.923239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009546537162739227,"score_gpt":0.2135854450085204,"score_spread":0.2040389078457812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}