{"id":"W1984436990","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.3.343","title":"A CONTEXTUAL APPROACH TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF THE STATE'S FORENSIC SCIENCE AND MEDICAL EVIDENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Political science; Federal Rules of Evidence; Admissible evidence; Law; Scientific evidence; Criminal justice; Contemplation; Adversary; Empirical evidence; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006019539,0.00006687635,0.0001864755,0.00001225672,0.001193058,0.000005078161,0.0008610873,0.00007331469,0.001718482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006862941,0.00003708426,0.00005003215,0.00008401842,0.001735714,0.0004630424,0.0004558508,0.0005145472,0.000004085843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001903454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009321257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06089555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04611289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997702,0.0006680569,0.0002605242,0.0001598467,0.0009636573,0.000245922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974045,0.0008275097,0.0002810702,0.0003473864,0.0006836494,0.000455853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003040771,0.001226891,0.1233586,0.0008697451,0.0001951428,0.00002726467,0.7001023,0.000004119816,0.0005047022,0.09387325,0.02668235,0.05011483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002262656,0.0009893606,0.5368575,0.002107907,0.0002277876,0.00007593202,0.3330477,0.0006057374,0.0003170852,0.003533337,0.1196594,0.0003155986],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9299803,0.0005306237,0.0008015687,0.008191578,0.000406655,0.0005941759,0.000007624667,0.000009603801,0.05947784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975611,0.0001213691,0.001400087,0.0006035179,0.00004970824,2.160313e-7,4.496053e-8,0.000002219396,0.0002617554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4134989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0980487035760128,"score_gpt":0.3624665555673414,"score_spread":0.2644178519913286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}