{"id":"W1984675515","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2011.09.025","title":"Toxicological significance of mercury in yellow perch in the Laurentian Great Lakes region","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks","funders":"Great Lakes Fishery Commission; Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Perch; Mercury (programming language); Methylmercury; Fishery; Trophic level; Biology; Environmental science; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Bioaccumulation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002768183,0.000113903,0.0001292824,0.0000407746,0.00005912934,0.000004100656,0.00016821,0.0000669408,0.001863208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000146688,0.00008234384,0.00004685215,0.0001790282,0.0004404199,0.0001714448,0.00006560179,0.0001261356,0.0001169531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001562313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000273536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003046737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007661738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989508,0.0001696361,0.0002327748,0.0002030015,0.0002338747,0.0002098595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997035,0.00002523412,0.00007266163,0.0001643672,4.511455e-7,0.00003373026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001047353,0.0007284909,0.880543,0.000008442871,0.00000920948,0.00003394603,0.01817051,0.0001512608,0.08731158,0.0002116101,0.001997052,0.01073018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002742202,0.0001113032,0.9912339,0.00000920646,0.000006877447,0.000008049575,0.00297128,0.00003984862,0.003725461,0.0004180776,0.001099217,0.0001025084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916161,0.00009193218,0.0000544002,0.0002630219,0.0000490598,0.0002811238,0.000007342016,0.00000733341,0.007629716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992853,0.0001370285,0.00008662943,0.0002124436,0.00001294718,0.00003151286,0.000007917762,0.000005230498,0.0002209912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.110691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03842659704669597,"score_gpt":0.2400051638457677,"score_spread":0.2015785667990718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}