{"id":"W1984718348","doi":"10.1007/s11165-008-9118-5","title":"Reading Science Texts—Epistemology, Inquiry, Authenticity—A Rejoinder to Jonathan Osborne","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Science Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Epistemology; Section (typography); Set (abstract data type); Science education; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; Pedagogy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01244023,0.0001398474,0.00016814,0.002248183,0.001003405,0.0004169265,0.001648044,0.00009145834,0.0002384303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002135832,0.0001302074,0.0000290095,0.007617018,0.003721501,0.0007599851,0.0001839727,0.0004616578,0.0004864857],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001421487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007406975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001485679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000539755,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956244,0.0002656322,0.000380044,0.001007855,0.001347832,0.001374207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974221,0.000333291,0.00007841425,0.0008186948,0.0009270785,0.0004203948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000616963,0.001172095,0.04026295,0.00001744572,0.000003235106,0.000009820498,0.02668037,0.00003532151,0.02376509,0.8395299,0.01596779,0.05249431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009876001,0.0002856793,0.9247801,0.00007983275,0.000001235167,0.00004132256,0.02627443,0.00002252306,0.0008288799,0.04482143,0.002596557,0.0001692104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8764809,0.0001187447,0.00003994994,0.01921983,0.002593905,0.0005037113,9.312935e-7,0.00003734728,0.1010046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937024,0.000008361589,0.001164828,0.0005446904,0.0004101588,0.00009600422,0.00000284508,0.000007257888,0.004063475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8845172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2250799266847168,"score_gpt":0.5412468376626848,"score_spread":0.316166910977968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}