{"id":"W1984718348","doi":"10.1007/s11165-008-9118-5","title":"Reading Science Texts—Epistemology, Inquiry, Authenticity—A Rejoinder to Jonathan Osborne","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Science Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Epistemology; Section (typography); Set (abstract data type); Science education; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; Pedagogy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02486651,0.0009611813,0.00230884,0.00285136,0.01287619,0.01919866,0.004399465,0.02445322,0.003699786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0566721,0.001161128,0.0007357958,0.001784805,0.07805149,0.03699372,0.01031157,0.05485392,0.001661244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006008968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0154356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01395313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01386098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9862189,0.006337116,0.001094455,0.002171532,0.003600684,0.0005773813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9081287,0.077292,0.001767272,0.00268864,0.00751449,0.002608913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005693803,0.0000459766,0.0002177664,0.000189633,0.00002434783,0.0001805608,0.0353631,0.00009588736,0.000200576,0.7402674,0.2063093,0.0170485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005140393,0.00001741408,0.0002179019,0.0007227496,0.00001838734,0.0001725721,0.01371949,0.0002291568,0.0003047571,0.6735304,0.3109525,0.00006338803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001568613,0.01090057,0.00351069,0.9673708,0.005053338,0.00001963519,0.00001917202,0.00003173815,0.01152544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.181039,0.02098433,0.02116815,0.7058818,0.03353712,0.0004892455,0.00007486226,0.000604624,0.03622087],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02486651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1315082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2250799266847168,"score_gpt":0.5412468376626848,"score_spread":0.316166910977968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}