{"id":"W1984820664","doi":"10.1016/s0148-6195(00)00027-8","title":"Asymmetries in risk and in risk attitude: the duopoly case","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economics and Business","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Duopoly; Certainty; Microeconomics; Economics; Benchmark (surveying); Risk aversion (psychology); Simple (philosophy); Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics; Cournot competition; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009230303,0.0001180323,0.0004280172,0.000423388,0.0001207091,0.000199243,0.0001021398,0.00006749955,0.0001204116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006893227,0.00009305582,0.00007421932,0.0003222997,0.0001288818,0.0004513202,0.00003051888,0.0002203885,0.000011813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005017447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002193484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003312145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004639645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988913,0.00002108413,0.0007571621,0.0001656327,0.00001225483,0.0001525624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991449,0.0001012992,0.0005515203,0.0001221776,0.00002513925,0.00005500469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001346401,0.0001528569,0.9235632,0.00001976028,0.0001382063,0.00022288,0.0009331598,0.00550876,4.521671e-7,0.04596647,0.0001144827,0.02324516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002181404,0.00007452213,0.8456275,0.00002961601,0.00005683069,0.000737626,0.000477481,0.01691867,0.000005681808,0.09542474,0.03813477,0.0003311537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9682382,0.03035171,0.000008374869,0.0006724166,0.000117191,0.00005782047,0.00004817324,0.000001239827,0.0005048419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8228473,0.176698,0.0001095697,0.00008429573,0.00008808545,0.000001221543,7.666114e-7,0.000007996177,0.0001627886],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1463462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5006995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01513622066668156,"score_gpt":0.1959043457750871,"score_spread":0.1807681251084055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}