{"id":"W1984845825","doi":"10.1063/1.2346671","title":"A generalization of the charge equilibration method for nonmetallic materials","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Machine Learning in Materials Science","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Polarizability; Chemistry; Electronegativity; Charge (physics); Molecule; Computational chemistry; Mulliken population analysis; Covalent bond; Atomic charge; Generalization; Chemical physics; Statistical physics; Atomic physics; Density functional theory; Quantum mechanics; Physics; Mathematics; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005656448,0.0004145397,0.0005178558,0.0006688709,0.0004725057,0.0004784945,0.001884809,0.0008941265,0.003070828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001765547,0.0002373964,0.0006031616,0.0005687982,0.0004677617,0.001148945,0.0007743192,0.0009887773,0.0008364071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003156363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006310819,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009042417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001000007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998036,0.00004526405,0.000008425626,0.0000344028,0.00009207643,0.0000161622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996558,0.0001209085,0.00002828411,0.00009296583,0.00007816379,0.00002380871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001147159,0.0001828672,0.001697994,0.000286968,0.000132181,0.0004700523,0.0001817274,0.4282289,0.02720807,0.2060327,0.004722247,0.3307416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001734493,0.00003624605,0.0002480445,0.000009882475,0.000008369713,0.0001010038,0.00001083274,0.9428788,0.004801311,0.04693459,0.004937559,0.0000159552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008693601,0.0001138161,0.9887148,0.00006288165,0.00005343062,0.00005342986,0.00004119874,0.0003623609,0.001904451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3121704,0.0003078052,0.6789188,0.0002470529,0.0001126918,0.0003169972,0.0002460646,0.0004317106,0.007248391],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003070828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01027298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01276301309932478,"score_gpt":0.2776774084523592,"score_spread":0.2649143953530345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}