{"id":"W1984846764","doi":"10.1136/jech.2005.041350","title":"Explaining the social gradient in coronary heart disease: comparing relative and absolute risk approaches","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; U.S. Public Health Service","keywords":"Medicine; Absolute risk reduction; Relative risk; Population; Risk factor; Demography; Inequality; Social inequality; Coronary heart disease; Gerontology; Environmental health; Internal medicine; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03032359,0.001537249,0.001430969,0.004456962,0.0009658507,0.002636142,0.001971722,0.001315542,0.003039057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06428795,0.0006563244,0.003288272,0.002579484,0.0032832,0.003703743,0.003834341,0.001623042,0.0002012044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001543657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001773624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008605876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007395187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9760021,0.02047938,0.000533083,0.001265918,0.001389702,0.000329853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9365302,0.05596089,0.002814498,0.002741846,0.001410543,0.0005420525],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001883412,0.0004040757,0.6415456,0.002884137,0.01354038,0.000385824,0.004771714,0.06410789,0.0003828507,0.09958488,0.00287748,0.1676317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004091389,0.001372703,0.3369407,0.001804667,0.006696399,0.0005281033,0.006667878,0.2139085,0.0005943802,0.4224025,0.008395189,0.0002797988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6879808,0.03643176,0.2351536,0.01832019,0.001082208,0.000631556,0.001343828,0.0003353923,0.01872066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683781,0.003195906,0.02617733,0.0004855158,0.000562424,0.0001945487,0.0002792128,0.00005209653,0.0006749049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03032359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1603684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2450625159468197,"score_gpt":0.4290382521869551,"score_spread":0.1839757362401354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}