{"id":"W1984846764","doi":"10.1136/jech.2005.041350","title":"Explaining the social gradient in coronary heart disease: comparing relative and absolute risk approaches","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; U.S. Public Health Service","keywords":"Medicine; Absolute risk reduction; Relative risk; Population; Risk factor; Demography; Inequality; Social inequality; Coronary heart disease; Gerontology; Environmental health; Internal medicine; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02945843,0.0001210791,0.000732124,0.0001042197,0.003641622,0.00001638131,0.0003233643,0.0001042244,0.000006626153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003713002,0.00008951875,0.0001165432,0.0001663192,0.0007762989,0.0002140315,0.0001103335,0.00200022,9.624056e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005052376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006609535,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1499911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1234097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9821876,0.01574813,0.00110835,0.0001126207,0.000167155,0.0006761409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876253,0.01084074,0.0009906228,0.0001867927,0.00005502139,0.0003015411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006858049,0.00008391334,0.9011801,0.00004334752,0.00001250305,0.000001884594,0.01482095,0.0001849154,1.650353e-8,0.07921193,0.003464488,0.0009273909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003369617,0.00007605441,0.935971,0.0001138695,0.00001177437,0.000006789871,0.02199412,0.0002080089,9.44558e-9,0.03232352,0.008891824,0.00006610958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.879517,0.007386489,0.0002310596,0.1112252,0.0002197868,0.0002026622,0.000006740418,0.00001090231,0.001200225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911757,0.001691976,0.0008533358,0.005930834,0.0003045168,0.000005480983,0.000003909719,0.000007494673,0.00002681564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1116587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2450625159468197,"score_gpt":0.4290382521869551,"score_spread":0.1839757362401354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}