{"id":"W1985308475","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19723.x","title":"Tests of density dependence using indices of relative abundance in a deer population","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Northern Studies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Density dependence; Relative species abundance; Statistics; Abundance (ecology); Series (stratigraphy); Population; Odocoileus; Autoregressive model; Mathematics; Ecology; Econometrics; Population density; Linear regression; Biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002242325,0.00003670316,0.00007158941,0.00002245517,0.00002556174,9.343012e-7,0.00004921597,0.00005232007,0.0001463225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008291266,0.00003664594,0.00001162619,0.0001452676,0.00006331829,0.0004186185,0.00003545946,0.00005076897,0.00001524076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005862476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004857115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001276793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001559185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995691,0.00004387218,0.0001300147,0.00006937987,0.00009689037,0.00009079787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997217,0.00005653189,0.0001315893,0.0000681262,0.000005073672,0.00001697667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008161018,0.00003805089,0.9937313,0.00000372838,0.000001715335,2.650954e-7,0.0005118585,0.0003235328,0.004836001,0.000148954,0.000004660612,0.0003917645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007793705,0.00001091799,0.9966409,0.00001567626,0.000005005867,0.00000173054,0.00002752946,0.0005219131,0.002061576,0.0005970828,0.000003948505,0.00003578658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991455,0.00001911204,0.0002163402,0.0000228463,0.00004061822,0.00006641127,7.163908e-7,0.000003059988,0.0004854136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979261,0.000001215753,0.001995741,0.00003645006,0.000006793811,0.000001725371,0.000001220577,0.000002016547,0.00002876269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002909588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1930138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02038592002428794,"score_gpt":0.2586934829491538,"score_spread":0.2383075629248659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}