{"id":"W1985369104","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.022","title":"An interactive method for dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Ranking (information retrieval); Group decision-making; Aggregate (composite); Operator (biology); Computer science; Measure (data warehouse); TOPSIS; Mathematics; Group (periodic table); Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Operations research; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003045121,0.0008871863,0.001220805,0.001258765,0.0009412621,0.001342204,0.002459954,0.001117824,0.01349617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005883046,0.0005641378,0.001485529,0.001418945,0.0009214709,0.001644867,0.00274095,0.001719474,0.001570835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007252168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001313603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002048344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003094235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977551,0.0008635446,0.000106129,0.0003185789,0.0008175837,0.0001390296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962144,0.002702759,0.0001088285,0.0002906619,0.0005474979,0.0001359108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006047616,0.0004518253,0.0007412603,0.0005522723,0.0003009765,0.0003941184,0.0009961657,0.1533511,0.01381574,0.1584322,0.007156305,0.6632033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007890935,0.0001187378,0.0002655359,0.0000445587,0.00006635802,0.0001304289,0.00006128663,0.9466369,0.002974545,0.04158086,0.007991001,0.00005095611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001092465,0.00002102049,0.9974589,0.00002292718,0.00001745875,0.00003377142,0.00001990209,0.00017338,0.001160226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05922018,0.00005336208,0.9378352,0.00005993964,0.00003239069,0.0003184594,0.00009555563,0.0001230947,0.002261785],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01349617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04514915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.157470969285867,"score_gpt":0.4766061745075416,"score_spread":0.3191352052216745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}