{"id":"W1985392933","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.025","title":"Remote tourism and forest management: a spatial hedonic analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Alberta; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Tourism; Forest management; Environmental resource management; Geography; Business; Forestry; Economics; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064008,0.000248638,0.0007150787,0.0003982632,0.0001801287,0.0001852299,0.0002913035,0.0002270846,0.00152542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004083303,0.0002944436,0.0002680353,0.0002014946,0.0001116558,0.0002738433,0.0002289018,0.000184722,0.0009773306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002700357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009864934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001366878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002078088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978954,0.00001620981,0.0008394951,0.0007276937,0.00001357679,0.0005076679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989468,0.00008734912,0.0003518313,0.0004139612,0.000009828546,0.0001901921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001516622,0.0004577201,0.368113,0.00005617462,0.002131711,0.00004016089,0.0002964127,0.05016468,7.18062e-7,0.3743785,0.001536011,0.2026732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001235011,0.0001158196,0.3365444,0.00000358534,0.0001509086,0.000009162402,0.00004900639,0.4017385,0.000003199848,0.08252372,0.1768935,0.0007331297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8198296,0.0001818086,0.003997047,0.001280798,0.0002429832,0.0002045419,0.0000373035,0.00007393177,0.1741519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879583,0.002568938,0.007013516,0.0007604804,0.0003215598,0.00001209513,0.00003047444,0.00002797389,0.001306673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3515738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01577119920200197,"score_gpt":0.1949571513465884,"score_spread":0.1791859521445864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}