{"id":"W1985484870","doi":"10.1257/aer.99.3.725","title":"Trade, Tragedy, and the Commons","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Economic rent; Commons; Economics; Property rights; Common-pool resource; Transaction cost; Resource (disambiguation); Economic system; Business; Market economy; Microeconomics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008218107,0.0001869435,0.0008696108,0.00005451583,0.0001269191,0.00006376747,0.0003128204,0.00002607216,0.0002542476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004575137,0.0001486263,0.0001877226,0.00009258859,0.0004895194,0.0001253632,0.00007302305,0.0001730716,0.0009458991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001918376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002846823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000767907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009174113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985079,0.00002186321,0.0007889371,0.0003817409,0.00001431218,0.0002852022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989105,0.00008969685,0.000515546,0.0003731141,0.000002306409,0.0001088149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003428531,0.00004009597,0.005428017,0.0002735772,0.0002426011,0.000004043567,0.0006751773,0.00007269214,3.876881e-7,0.8031762,0.009721116,0.1803318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001602547,0.00004301066,0.01636449,0.0001851011,0.00002170042,0.0000474037,0.00009368,0.00007903517,0.00000246846,0.02372162,0.9574721,0.0003668727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2134831,0.5062215,0.0002944296,0.1346027,0.000703942,0.001704606,0.0001153172,0.0001011347,0.1427733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7913989,0.1966289,0.0004434917,0.01097713,0.00008165066,0.00008295169,0.000008127973,0.00002668688,0.0003521224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9477509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01857535677046484,"score_gpt":0.2219522247289435,"score_spread":0.2033768679584787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}